The Art of Appreciation and Criticism
Dr. Santosh Kumar Mohapatra
Many people believe that appreciating or criticizing others is an easy task. In reality, both are among the most difficult responsibilities. Whether one is evaluating an individual, an organisation, or a government policy, opinions must be supported by facts, evidence, and reasoned arguments.
It is easy to make sweeping statements such as “this person is committed” or “that person is not,” “this individual is knowledgeable” or “that one lacks knowledge.” However, such assertions have little value unless they are backed by concrete examples and verifiable achievements.
True appreciation requires identifying and acknowledging specific contributions and accomplishments. Similarly, meaningful criticism should focus on actual shortcomings, supported by facts rather than personal likes, dislikes, or prejudices.
On several occasions, I have written retirement leaflets in English for comrades. I have never followed a standard template for everyone. Instead, I have highlighted the particular strengths, qualities, and achievements of each individual. Genuine appreciation must be based on what a person has actually done, not on exaggerated praise. Likewise, criticism must be fair, objective, and evidence-based.
The credibility of both appreciation and criticism depends not on the strength of our emotions, but on the strength of our facts.
Many people believe that appreciating or criticizing others is an easy task- Dr. Santosh Kumar Mohapatra Cuttack
Leave a Reply